MEDDIC vs SPICED: Should You Use?

Choosing the right sales qualification framework can mean the difference between a predictable pipeline and a forecasting nightmare. If you’ve been comparing MEDDIC and SPICED, you’re already ahead of teams that rely on gut instinct alone.

Both frameworks help sales teams qualify leads more effectively, but they approach the challenge from different angles. MEDDIC brings structure and rigor to complex sales environments, while SPICED offers a more flexible framework designed for customer centric selling.

In this guide, you’ll learn exactly when to use each methodology, how they differ in practice, and whether combining them makes sense for your team. By the end, you’ll have a clear decision framework for implementing the best lead qualification framework for your specific sales scenarios.

Quick Answer: When to Use MEDDIC vs SPICED

Here’s the short version: MEDDIC works best for complex sales with longer sales cycles (6-12+ months) and multiple stakeholders, typically with deal sizes above $50k ACV. SPICED shines in shorter, discovery-driven cycles (1-6 months) where understanding the prospect’s current situation and creating urgency matters more than mapping out intricate buying processes.

Consider these real-world examples:

  • Enterprise cybersecurity vendor selling to Fortune 500 banks: MEDDIC. You’re dealing with 8-12 stakeholders, regulatory requirements, a formal paper process, and a decision making process that spans multiple quarters.
  • Series B project management SaaS selling to mid-market tech firms: SPICED. Your sales cycle length is 60-90 days, the decision maker is often the VP or director who feels the pain directly, and urgency around a critical event (like a product launch) drives the deal.
  • HR tech platform selling to enterprise and SMB segments simultaneously: Hybrid. Use SPICED for discovery and early qualification, then layer in MEDDIC for deals that grow complex.

Use MEDDIC When…

Use SPICED When…

Deal size exceeds $75k-$100k ACV

Deal size is $10k-$75k ACV

Sales cycle is 6+ months

Sales cycle is 1-6 months

5+ stakeholders involved

1-3 key stakeholders

Formal procurement and RFP processes

Faster, founder-led or director-level decisions

ROI and metrics drive the conversation

Emotional impact and urgency close the deal

 

Most teams with mixed deal sizes should blend both: use SPICED for early discovery and coaching, then apply MEDDIC rigor for late-stage qualification and forecasting.

What Is the MEDDIC Sales Framework?

MEDDIC is a structured framework for qualifying complex B2B deals, developed in the mid-1990s at PTC (Parametric Technology Corporation) by Jack Napoli and Dick Dunkel. It was built to bring discipline to enterprise sales where deals involved multiple decision makers and lengthy procurement cycles.

The MEDDIC framework breaks qualification into six components:

  • Metrics: Quantifiable measures of success the prospect cares about. What ROI, cost savings, or revenue impact will your solution deliver?
  • Economic Buyer: The person with financial authority to approve the purchase. Not just an influencer, the one who signs off on budget.
  • Decision Criteria: The formal and informal standards the prospect’s organization uses to evaluate solutions. What must your product do to win?
  • Decision Process: The step-by-step journey from initial interest to signed contract. Who reviews what, and when?
  • Identify Pain: The specific pain points driving the prospect to consider change. What business challenges are costing them money, time, or competitive position?
  • Champion: Your internal advocate within the customer’s organization who actively sells on your behalf when you’re not in the room.

In practice, sales reps use MEDDIC to inspect deals during pipeline reviews, forecast with confidence, and avoid pursuing sales opportunities that will stall or end in “no decision.”

Example in action: A sales team selling a $250k ARR CRM to a global manufacturing company would use MEDDIC to:

  • Quantify metrics (e.g., “reduce sales admin time by 30%, worth $180k annually”)
  • Identify the CFO as the economic buyer
  • Map decision criteria (integration with SAP, mobile access, GDPR compliance)
  • Document a 4-month decision process with legal, IT, and procurement reviews
  • Surface the pain (lost deals due to slow follow-up)
  • Develop the VP of Sales as their champion

You may also encounter variants like MEDDICC (adding Competition) or MEDDPICC (adding Paper Process and Competition). These extend the core methodology focuses without fundamentally changing the approach.

MEDDIC is typically applied from mid-funnel onward, once you’ve confirmed genuine interest and need a deeper understanding of whether the deal can actually close.

What Is the SPICED Sales Framework?

SPICED is a modern framework developed by Winning by Design in the 2010s, built specifically for SaaS companies and recurring revenue businesses. It takes a customer centric approach that covers the entire customer journey, from first touch through renewal and expansion. SPICED is characterized by a consultative framework focused on understanding the customer’s world and motivations.

Here’s what each element means:

  • Situation: The prospect’s current situation and business context right now. Assessing the prospect’s current situation helps sales reps understand the environment and challenges the prospect faces, including industry trends, company growth stage, team structure, and existing tools.
  • Pain: The specific problems causing friction. Uncovering the customer's pain points is essential for a consultative sales approach, as it allows sales reps to deeply understand the customer’s needs and motivations, what’s broken, slow, or frustrating?
  • Impact: The ripple effect of that pain. How does it affect revenue, team morale, customer satisfaction, or competitive standing?
  • Critical Event: A time-sensitive trigger creating urgency. Board meetings, product launches, regulatory deadlines, or fiscal year-end.
  • Decision: How will the decision be made? Who’s involved, what’s the timeline, what approvals are needed?

SPICED requires gathering context, discovering pain points, and understanding critical events that drive decisions. It emphasizes empathetic discovery, focusing on the customer’s emotional impact and motivations. SPICED is particularly suited for industries with a focus on customer success and recurring revenue. It is also great for companies with a shorter sales cycle and products or services that aren’t overly complex.

Unlike MEDDIC’s focus on organizational mechanics, SPICED emphasizes emotional and business impact. It pushes sales professionals to understand not just what the prospect needs, but why they need it now and what happens if they don’t act.

Example in action: A sales rep at a SaaS startup runs a 45-minute discovery call with a VP of Sales at a 200-person tech company. Using SPICED, they uncover:

  • Situation: Post-Series B, scaling from 5 to 15 reps in Q3
  • Pain: Current CRM can’t handle territory assignments or reporting
  • Impact: Reps fighting over leads, 20% pipeline leakage, VP looks bad in board meetings
  • Critical Event: New sales hires start in 6 weeks; VP needs a system before onboarding
  • Decision: VP owns it, CFO signs off on anything over $30k, 2-week evaluation process

SPICED works particularly well in modern B2B environments with fast feedback loops, consultative selling motions, and subscription models where understanding customer needs drives both initial close and long term relationships.Key Components of a Sales Qualification Framework

A sales qualification framework is the backbone of an effective sales process, providing sales teams with a structured approach to evaluate and prioritize potential customers. At its core, a sales qualification framework helps sales reps determine which leads are most likely to convert, ensuring that time and resources are focused on the highest-value sales opportunities.

The essential components of any robust sales qualification framework include a deep understanding of the prospect’s business, the ability to identify and quantify pain points, and a clear view of the decision-making process within the prospect’s organization. Sales professionals must also consider the presence of multiple stakeholders, each with their own decision criteria and influence over the buying process. Recognizing the economic buyer, the individual with the authority and financial resources to approve the purchase, is critical for moving deals forward and avoiding late-stage surprises.

Frameworks like MEDDIC and SPICED are designed to address these critical aspects. MEDDIC excels in complex sales environments and enterprise sales, where longer sales cycles, multiple decision makers, and formal procurement processes are the norm. It brings rigor to lead qualification by mapping out decision criteria, identifying champions, and ensuring every step of the decision process is understood. On the other hand, SPICED offers a more flexible framework that adapts to a variety of sales scenarios, focusing on the customer’s current situation, urgency, and the emotional drivers behind their buying decisions.

A well-implemented sales qualification framework empowers sales teams to qualify leads more effectively, manage their pipeline with greater accuracy, and tailor their sales strategy to the customer’s unique challenges. Sales leaders and managers can use these frameworks to train their teams, drive consistency, and ensure that every sales call uncovers the information needed to advance the deal. This structured approach is especially valuable in complex sales environments, where understanding the prospect’s business and aligning with their decision-making process can be the difference between winning and losing in competitive markets.

Ultimately, the best lead qualification framework is one that aligns with your target market, sales cycle length, and overall sales strategy. Whether you choose MEDDIC, SPICED, or a hybrid approach, the goal is to develop a customer-centric qualification process that delivers a deeper understanding of your potential customers, accelerates closing deals, and supports long-term revenue growth. By continuously refining your qualification framework, your sales team will be better equipped to navigate complex sales, address customer pain points, and maintain a competitive edge.

Critical Events and Sales Cycles

Critical events are powerful drivers in the sales process, especially within complex sales environments where timing can make or break a deal. A critical event is any time-sensitive trigger, such as a product launch, regulatory deadline, leadership change, or market shift, that compels a prospect to act. For sales teams, recognizing and leveraging these critical events is essential for shaping an effective sales strategy and accelerating the sales cycle.

In both the MEDDIC and SPICED frameworks, understanding the prospect’s critical event is a key factor in qualifying opportunities and aligning your approach with the customer’s decision-making process. By identifying what’s truly urgent for the prospect, sales reps can connect their solution directly to the customer’s pain points and business priorities. This not only helps in crafting a compelling value proposition but also in creating the momentum needed to move deals forward and avoid stalls.

For example, if a prospect’s business is facing a looming compliance deadline, sales reps can tailor their messaging to address the specific pain points and risks associated with missing that deadline. In complex sales environments, where multiple stakeholders are involved, aligning your sales strategy with the prospect’s critical event ensures that everyone is focused on the same goal and timeline. Ultimately, understanding and acting on critical events increases your chances of closing deals and building long-term customer relationships.

MEDDIC vs SPICED: Key Differences and Similarities

Both MEDDIC and SPICED are structured qualification frameworks that push sales reps beyond surface-level interest. But they approach qualification from different angles: MEDDIC focuses on organizational mechanics and buying process, while SPICED emphasizes human context and emotional drivers.

Aspect

MEDDIC

SPICED

Primary focus

Deal mechanics, procurement process, quantified value

Customer context, pain impact, urgency creation

Best fit deals

Enterprise, $100k+ ACV, 6-12+ month cycles

Mid-market, $10k-$75k ACV, 1-6 month cycles

Strengths

Forecast accuracy, multi-stakeholder mapping, champion building

Discovery depth, coaching-friendly, full journey coverage

Common pitfalls

Can feel interrogative; overkill for simple deals

May miss procurement complexity; lighter on metrics

Framework style

Checklist-driven, governance-oriented

Conversational, diagnostic

 

Key similarities worth noting:

  • Both reduce wasted time on unqualified deals by forcing rigor early
  • Both improve forecasting consistency across sales teams
  • Both push reps to go deeper than “they said they’re interested”
  • Both require management reinforcement to stick

The emotional versus rational distinction matters in practice. MEDDIC emphasizes hard metrics and the formal buying process, ideal when CFOs scrutinize every dollar. SPICED balances business impact with emotional drivers and urgency, critical when pain points and a critical event are what actually move deals forward.

Mini case contrast: Imagine qualifying the same opportunity, a $60k deal with a 90-day cycle.

  • MEDDIC-first approach: Rep focuses on identifying the economic buyer (CFO), documenting decision criteria (must integrate with Slack), and quantifying metrics (save 10 hours/week per rep). Risk: may miss the urgency driver entirely.
  • SPICED-first approach: Rep leads with Situation (company just lost a major deal due to slow response) and Impact (CEO is furious, VP’s job is on the line). Risk: may not fully map the procurement process and get surprised by legal review.

The best sales reps use elements of both, adapting based on what the deal requires.

MEDDIC: Pros, Cons, and Best Use Cases

MEDDIC has a 25+ year track record in complex B2B sales, enterprise software, telecom, manufacturing, and cybersecurity. It remains the qualification method of choice for organizations where deal inspection and forecast accuracy are non-negotiable.

Benefits of MEDDIC:

  • Deep deal inspection: Forces reps to validate every critical aspect of a deal, reducing late-stage surprises
  • Champion development: Explicit focus on building an internal advocate who sells when you’re not there
  • CFO-ready justification: Metrics-first approach aligns with how economic buyers evaluate purchases
  • Forecast accuracy: Gives sales managers concrete criteria to assess deal probability
  • Multi-stakeholder clarity: Maps complex buying processes with multiple decision makers

Drawbacks of MEDDIC:

  • Can feel interrogative: Inexperienced reps may fire off MEDDIC questions like a checklist, alienating prospects
  • Heavy for simple deals: Using full MEDDIC on a $15k transactional sales opportunity wastes time
  • Training overhead: Requires significant enablement investment and ongoing coaching
  • Less customer-centric: Focuses on qualification mechanics rather than the customer’s unique challenges

Pros

Cons

Superior deal qualification

Time-intensive to apply fully

Strong champion-building methodology

Can overwhelm smaller deals

Quantified value for ROI-focused buyers

Requires heavy training and reinforcement

Reliable forecasting framework

May feel rigid or interrogative

 

Best use cases for MEDDIC:

  • Deals above $100k ARR with 5+ stakeholders
  • RFP-heavy public sector or healthcare contracts
  • Multi-region enterprise rollouts with legal, IT, and procurement reviews
  • Industries where ROI justification is table stakes (financial services, manufacturing)

Scenario that saved a deal: A rep was 8 weeks into a $180k opportunity when MEDDIC-disciplined pipeline review revealed the “decision maker” they’d been selling to actually needed CFO approval for anything over $50k. By identifying the true economic buyer late in the cycle and pivoting their strategy, they closed the deal, two weeks after their competitor got ghosted by the same “decision maker.”

SPICED: Pros, Cons, and Best Use Cases

SPICED represents a modern evolution of classic frameworks like BANT and SPIN Selling, tailored specifically for subscription and recurring revenue businesses. It’s designed to work from prospecting through renewal, making it a natural fit for SaaS companies running full-cycle sales motions.

Advantages of SPICED:

  • Fast adoption: Most teams can implement SPICED in 30-60 days with basic training
  • Full journey coverage: Works from first touch through expansion, not just qualification
  • Coaching-friendly: Conversation-based structure makes it easy to review sales calls and provide feedback
  • Customer-centric by design: Starts with the prospect’s timeline and situation rather than your checklist
  • Urgency creation: Critical Event element helps reps surface and create time-sensitive triggers

Limitations of SPICED:

  • Lighter on procurement complexity: May not capture all steps in highly regulated industries
  • Less metrics-focused: Can leave financial resources and ROI justification underexplored
  • Too light for mega-deals: 12+ month sales cycles with 10+ stakeholders need more structure
  • Subjectivity risk: Without hard metrics, qualification can become too intuitive

When SPICED shines:

  • PLG-supported sales teams adding sales-assist to product-led motion
  • SDR-to-AE handoff processes where discovery depth matters
  • 30-180 day sales cycles with $10k-$60k ACV
  • Mid-market SaaS where pain and urgency outweigh formal procurement
  • Teams using conversation intelligence tools that can track SPICED adherence

Example use case: A collaboration platform sells into marketing teams across North America and Europe. Their sales cycle is 60-90 days, deals average $35k, and the typical buyer is a Director of Marketing who feels the pain of scattered project tracking daily. SPICED helps reps quickly understand the prospect’s organization structure, quantify the impact of missed deadlines, and tie urgency to an upcoming campaign launch.The Role of the Champion in Sales

Within the MEDDIC framework, the champion is a linchpin for success in complex sales scenarios. A champion is an internal advocate, someone inside the prospect’s organization who believes in your solution and is willing to support your sales effort. This individual not only provides valuable insights into the organization’s needs and pain points but also helps navigate the often intricate decision-making process involving multiple stakeholders.

For sales reps and sales teams, identifying and nurturing a champion is essential for a smooth and effective sales process. Champions can open doors to key decision-makers, clarify internal priorities, and advocate for your solution when you’re not in the room. In complex sales environments, where deals can stall due to competing interests or shifting priorities, a strong champion can keep the process moving and ensure your solution remains top of mind.

A customer-centric approach means working closely with your champion to understand the specific pain points and business challenges facing the prospect’s organization. By leveraging the champion’s influence and expertise, sales teams can tailor their sales strategy to address these unique needs, increasing the likelihood of a successful outcome. Ultimately, the champion is not just a supporter, they are a strategic partner in closing complex deals and building lasting customer relationships.

Sales Qualification Frameworks and Customer Needs

Sales qualification frameworks like MEDDIC and SPICED are essential tools for sales teams aiming to understand customer needs and prioritize leads effectively. These frameworks provide a structured approach to sales qualification, enabling sales reps to systematically assess potential customers, uncover their pain points, and develop a targeted sales strategy that resonates with each prospect.

By implementing a robust sales qualification framework, sales teams can focus their efforts on the most promising opportunities, ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently and that every interaction delivers value to the customer. In today’s competitive markets, this structured approach is crucial for standing out from the competition, building long-term relationships, and driving consistent revenue growth.

A well-chosen qualification framework helps sales reps identify not only which leads are most likely to convert, but also how to address each customer’s unique needs throughout the sales process. Whether using MEDDIC, SPICED, or a hybrid approach, the goal is to create a repeatable, customer-centric process that supports both short-term wins and long-term success. By continuously refining their qualification framework, sales teams can adapt to changing market conditions, deepen their understanding of customer needs, and maintain a competitive edge.

Can You Combine MEDDIC and SPICED?

Many high-performing sales teams in 2025 don’t choose between MEDDIC and SPICED, they blend both frameworks intentionally, using each where it adds the most value.

A practical hybrid approach:

  1. SPICED guides early discovery: Reps use Situation, Pain, and Impact questions during first calls to build rapport and understand the prospect’s business deeply
  2. Critical Event creates urgency: As discovery progresses, reps identify or create time-sensitive triggers that justify action
  3. MEDDIC overlays for deal reviews: Once an opportunity moves to late-stage, managers evaluate deals against MEDDIC criteria, Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Process, and Champion

Real-world example: A 20-person sales team at a Series C SaaS company uses this approach:

  • Discovery call scripts follow SPICED structure, making sales calls conversational and customer-focused
  • CRM opportunity fields are mapped to MEDDIC components (Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, etc.)
  • Weekly pipeline reviews assess late-stage deals against MEDDIC checkpoints
  • Deal coaching sessions use SPICED recordings to identify gaps in Impact or Critical Event exploration

This interoperability works because SPICED language is customer-facing and consultative, while MEDDIC fields are internal and governance-focused. Reps never ask a prospect, “Who’s your economic buyer?”, but managers absolutely need to know the answer before committing forecast dollars.

Visual concept: Imagine the customer journey as a timeline. SPICED maps to each stage, prospecting, discovery, evaluation, decision, and post-sale. MEDDIC checkpoints sit as gates at key milestones: “Before we advance to proposal, have we validated Metrics, Economic Buyer, and Champion?”

The Importance of Flexibility in Sales

Flexibility is a cornerstone of success in today’s complex sales environments. Sales reps must be able to adapt their approach to the unique needs, timelines, and decision-making processes of each prospect. This is where frameworks like SPICED shine, offering a more flexible framework compared to the structured rigor of MEDDIC. SPICED allows sales teams to adjust their sales process in real time, responding to shifting priorities, new stakeholders, or unexpected challenges.

Being flexible enables sales teams to navigate the complexities of multiple stakeholders and evolving customer needs, ensuring that their sales strategy remains relevant and effective. It also allows for the integration of new sales tools and technologies, such as AI-powered platforms, that can streamline the sales process, provide deeper insights, and boost productivity.

In practice, flexibility means listening closely to the customer, customizing your approach, and being willing to pivot as new information emerges. Sales reps who embrace a flexible mindset are better equipped to handle the unpredictability of complex sales, build stronger relationships, and ultimately close more deals. In a rapidly changing market, the ability to adapt is not just an advantage, it’s a necessity.

How to Choose Between MEDDIC and SPICED for Your Team

The right choice depends on your deal complexity, team maturity, and what sales leaders need to achieve in 2025-2026. Neither framework is universally “best”, fit matters more than the acronym.

Evaluation criteria to consider:

Factor

Points Toward MEDDIC

Points Toward SPICED

Average deal size

>$75k ACV

<$75k ACV

Sales cycle length

6+ months

1-6 months

Stakeholders per deal

5+

1-4

Regulatory/procurement complexity

High

Low to moderate

Current win rate challenge

Late-stage stalls, poor forecasting

Early qualification, discovery depth

 

Decision checklist:

Start with MEDDIC if 3+ apply:

  • Your average deal size exceeds $100k
  • Deals regularly involve 5+ stakeholders
  • You lose deals to “no decision” more than competitors
  • Your industry requires formal procurement or RFP responses
  • CFO or finance approval is standard

Start with SPICED if 3+ apply:

  • Your average deal size is under $75k
  • Sales cycles are typically 1-6 months
  • Deals are often founder-led or director-approved
  • You need to improve discovery and early qualification
  • Your team struggles to create urgency

Recommended pilot approach:

Run a 90-day test in Q2 or Q3 2025. Assign one segment of reps to run MEDDIC-first while another uses SPICED-first. Then compare key factors:

  • Conversion rate from first meeting to qualified opportunity
  • Opportunity-to-close rate by stage
  • Forecast accuracy (predicted vs. actual close dates)
  • Rep feedback on ease of adoption

Whatever you choose, align the framework with your sales tools, CRM fields, enablement content, call recording platforms. Inconsistency kills adoption faster than picking the “wrong” framework.

Common Mistakes in Sales Qualification

Even the best sales teams can fall into common traps when it comes to sales qualification. One of the most frequent mistakes is failing to truly understand the prospect’s business and customer needs, resulting in a generic sales approach that lacks relevance and impact. Without a clear grasp of the customer’s pain points and priorities, sales reps risk missing the mark and losing valuable opportunities.

Another common pitfall is neglecting to identify all key decision-makers and stakeholders involved in the buying process. In complex sales, overlooking these individuals can lead to stalled deals and lost influence, as critical voices are left out of the conversation. Additionally, sales teams sometimes ignore or underestimate the importance of critical events and timelines, failing to align their sales strategy with the prospect’s most pressing needs.

To avoid these mistakes, it’s essential to implement a robust sales qualification framework that guides sales reps through a structured approach to lead qualification. By focusing on understanding the customer’s business, mapping out the decision-making process, and staying attuned to critical events, sales teams can prioritize leads more accurately, tailor their sales efforts, and drive better results. In competitive markets, avoiding these common errors is key to building a high-performing sales organization and achieving long-term success.

Implementing MEDDIC or SPICED in Your Sales Process

Success with any qualification framework depends less on the acronym and more on adoption, coaching, and reinforcement. A beautifully designed methodology that reps ignore is worthless.

Practical rollout plan:

  1. Define stages and criteria: Map your current sales process stages to the framework. Where does each MEDDIC/SPICED element get captured?
  2. Update CRM fields: Add required fields for each framework component. Make them mandatory for stage advancement where appropriate.
  3. Train managers first: Sales managers must understand and model the methodology before reps will take it seriously.
  4. Train reps with live practice: Role-plays, shadow calls, and call reviews beat slide decks every time.
  5. Create documented playbooks: Build sample qualification questions for each letter of the framework, objection handling scripts, and email templates.

Leveraging sales tools and AI:

Modern conversation intelligence platforms can track adherence to MEDDIC or SPICED automatically. After each call, AI can flag:

  • Did the rep explore Pain/Impact sufficiently?
  • Was Economic Buyer identified?
  • Did a Critical Event get surfaced?

This turns pipeline management from opinion-based to data-driven.

Coaching rhythm:

  • Weekly deal reviews using framework criteria
  • Bi-weekly call listening sessions to coach deeper exploration
  • Monthly methodology refreshers addressing common gaps

Follow-up timeline:

Checkpoint

Focus

30 days

Refine questions, address confusion, capture early feedback

60 days

Adjust CRM fields based on actual usage, identify adoption gaps

90 days

Measure impact on conversion rates, decide on expansion or adjustment

 

Framework implementation is a process, not an event. Expect to iterate based on what your team actually encounters in competitive markets.

Final Thoughts: MEDDIC vs SPICED in the Future of B2B Sales

MEDDIC remains the gold standard for qualifying complex enterprise deals where multiple stakeholders, lengthy decision processes, and quantified value drive decisions. SPICED aligns with modern, customer centric selling, especially in SaaS environments where understanding the customer’s situation and creating urgency matters as much as mapping procurement. Solution selling, as a sales methodology, emphasizes understanding customer needs and challenges to present tailored solutions. It is highly customer-centric, has evolved over time, and relies on in-depth research and customization to address each client’s unique requirements.

No single sales methodology is “best.” Your target market, deal complexity, team experience, and sales strategy all influence which approach, or combination, will work.

The future likely belongs to blended frameworks and data-driven qualification. AI insights from sales calls and CRM activity will increasingly tell sales managers which MEDDIC or SPICED elements are being covered, and which get skipped. The teams that win in competitive markets will use these other sales methodologies as starting points, then adapt based on real pipeline data.

Here’s what to do next:

Don’t spend another quarter debating frameworks theoretically. Pick one approach, MEDDIC, SPICED, or a deliberate hybrid, and commit to a 90-day pilot with a subset of your team. Define what you’ll measure. Train your managers. Update your CRM. Review calls weekly.

Then look at the data and decide whether to expand, adjust, or try something different.

The best sales professionals don’t chase buzzwords. They test, measure, and iterate. Your next quarter starts with a decision, make it this week.